A long, long article where New Scientist report on how Darwin's Tree of Life theory was incorrect. I hope this is not another Scientist’s self propaganda but base on objective facts.
Here – (Link) Via The deep of Time, New Scientist, Why Darwin was wrong about the tree of life.
3 comments:
Hey, I've got an amazing idea. Why don't you READ the article and FIND OUT whether it is based on objective facts. Or would that get in the way of writing piffle about things you can't be arsed to read?
Pitiful.
Thanks for sharing, "Anonymous". I have limited knowledge on this topic. Please share whatever light you have on this. Thanks.
Darwinist using a "Deus ex machina" invented Evolution where there should be Diversification. Evolution to what and by which means? Who is a director of it? Mind you: religion is not a science.
Post a Comment